| 

Eppie’s
Great Race Is World’s Oldest Triathlon
Ironman Ty Hadley, 74, Is Man
to Beat at Eppie’s Great Race 2010
Diversity
and Aging in Sacramento County
Matsui
Announces Grant for Tutoring Program Encouraging Seniors to Mentor
Local Students
Day
Trips: Virginia City’s ‘Must See’ Mark
Twain Bookstore
Ken's
Corner: Roller Skating Is Fun for the Whole Family
This
Week's Columnists
HOME
|
 |
Why
the Government Cannot Control Medical Costs
By
Alieta Eck, M.D.
Guest Columnist
From
the patients in my office we can learn why Medicare and Medicaid
cannot control costs. Neither the president, the Congress, nor learned
journals are telling these stories.
A spry, cheerful patient told me that she had fainted under the hairdryer in
her beauty salon. The rescue squad rushed her to the emergency room of the nearest
hospital. On the way, she was alert and speaking clearly with no weakness of
her arms or legs. She told the rescuers that this had happened once before a
few years ago.
All indications pointed to a simple fainting spell. Maybe she was dehydrated.
The warmth from the hairdryer probably caused blood vessels to dilate and her
blood pressure to drop.
Nevertheless, she spent three days in the hospital with EKG monitoring, and underwent
a CT scan, an MRI, an EEG, and endless blood tests — all normal. Several
specialists were called in for this “complicated” case. Finally,
the patient insisted on going home even though some advised her to stay a little
longer. She commented on how she probably would never have even been admitted
had she not been covered by Medicare. And Medicare (working people and their
as-yet-unborn grandchildren) will probably pay more than $20,000 for her hospital
visit.
A television commercial states: “Last year, nine out of 10 people got their
Hoveround for little or no money.” A perfectly healthy appearing actress,
sitting in her fancy scooter, folding her wash, says, “With Medicare and
my insurance, I paid nothing out of pocket.”
Those commercials ignore the fact that someone is paying for those expensive
scooters — just not the actual users.
In a free clinic, one patient told me she preferred brand name drugs to the much
lower cost generic. “Why?” I asked. “My friend told me the
brand name is better.” Her prescriptions are covered by Medicaid, so all
her medicines are paid for by someone else. I respectfully declined to write, “brand
medically necessary” and explained that although the medicine was free
to her, the State of New Jersey is out of money, and the generic will probably
work just as well.
Are these patients or their physicians committing fraud? No. They are simply
acting legally to enhance their own well-being, following the incentives set
up by the unwieldy system. People with “coverage” do not care what
costs they incur, and those who provide services benefit by providing more.
As with the oil rig in the Gulf, there is a lot of pressure behind the leak.
Adding more pressure — as with the Democrats’ idea of saving money
by covering everybody — is not the answer. It can only make things worse.
We have, in fact, already tried it — in Massachusetts. The one-state version
of ObamaCare functions only because of heavy federal subsidies. Massachusetts
has tried to limit fees, and still the state is hemorrhaging cash. Massachusetts
Medicaid went from $1 billion to $1.75 billion in four short years, and the federal
government — actually the taxpayers from the other 49 states — subsidized
half that increase.
Will it take a bomb to stop the leak before we are smothered in oil or debt that
our grandchildren will never be able to repay? What will be the result of the
looming 21 percent cut in Medicare payments to physicians?
Doctors who have been accepting steadily diminishing payments to care for the
elderly are increasingly bolting out of the system. Savvy Medicare recipients
will continue to secure their free Hoverounds, but the weaker, more confused,
sicker, and more vulnerable will find that fewer physicians will be able to care
for them. Once the nation is bankrupt, hospitals have closed, and physicians
have found alternate ways to earn a living, real medical needs will not be met.
The best medical care in the world will simply cease to exist. Then all Americans,
young and old, will feel the pain.
There is a better answer, pointed out by Rep. Ron Paul, M.D. (R-Texas): “We
need a system in America where patients pay cash for basic services and carry
insurance only for serious illnesses and accidents. “Health maintenance” is
the responsibility of each of us individually. We cannot continue to collectivize
the costs of healthcare and expect things to get better.”
TOP | HOME
This page and its contents ©2010
Metropolitan News Company, Inc.
|
 |
 |